Design/UX #4203: Change instances of 'Avatar' to 'Photo' - CUNY Academic Commons - CUNY Graduate Center - Project Tracking System

Actions

Copy link

Design/UX #4203

closed

Change instances of 'Avatar' to 'Photo'

Added by Samantha Raddatz almost 9 years ago. Updated almost 9 years ago.

Status:

Resolved

Priority name:

Normal

Assignee:

Daniel Jones

Category name:

User Experience

Target version:

1.9

Start date:

2015-06-25

Due date:

% Done:

Estimated time:

Deployment actions:

Description

On the profile page, the profile photo is referred to as an ‘Avatar’ rather than a photo. This term should be consistent with the drop down menu option language (‘Profile Photo’).

Change all instances of ‘Avatar’ to ‘Photo’ or ‘Profile Photo.’

Files

5changephoto.png (330 KB) 5changephoto.png

see 2.2, underlined 'avatar' text should be changed to 'photo'

Samantha Raddatz, 2015-06-25 10:06 AM

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Boone Gorges almost 9 years ago

Status changed from New to Assigned
Assignee changed from Boone Gorges to Daniel Jones
Target version set to 1.9

Dan, can you go hunting please? :)

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Daniel Jones almost 9 years ago

I think I got most of them: https://github.com/cuny-academic-commons/cac/commit/64cb1c52a6f9af04f133a84eca7b0c55bcdb3575

I wasn't able to add my changes to CAC Advanced Profiles, got an error message because it's in a submodule. There was just one instance but it's one of the more obvious ones - do you know how I can make that change? Does anything stick out here as missing to you? Think I've got it on account creation and editing, and even in the admin areas. I left references group avatars as avatar.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Boone Gorges almost 9 years ago

Status changed from Assigned to Resolved

I wasn't able to add my changes to CAC Advanced Profiles, got an error message because it's in a submodule.

This template can be overridden in our theme. (Not ideal, but meh.) Fixed in https://github.com/cuny-academic-commons/cac/commit/3996dd6658a0e04748ddda21647c0fa8f924cde4

Sam/Matt, do you want to pull this back into a minor release? My one concern about doing so is that it might obsolesce some of our documentation/screenshots.

Thanks, Dan!

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Samantha Raddatz almost 9 years ago

This is a minor enough semantic change that I'm not too concerned about it being immediately reflected in the codex, so I think we should go for it.
There have been enough smaller updates made lately that we should review all documentation for processes soon. Probably worth considering at the end of the summer.

Actions

Copy link