Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #25753

open

Address PHPStan issues in cac-onboarding and bp-two-factor

Added by Raymond Hoh 1 day ago. Updated 1 day ago.

Status:
New
Priority name:
Normal
Assignee:
Category name:
WordPress Plugins
Target version:
Start date:
2026-09-28
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Estimated time:
Deployment actions:

Description

As mentioned on the dev call last week, the cac-onboarding fatal error that caused #25655 could have been caught if a PHPStan task was set up.

I ran PHPStan locally for the cac-onboarding and bp-two-factor plugins and am going to push up some changes to address some minor things that PHPStan found.

Actions #1

Updated by Raymond Hoh 1 day ago

In https://github.com/cuny-academic-commons/cac/commit/ff5b38a6f7, I've pinned cac-onboarding with the following changes: https://github.com/cuny-academic-commons/cac-onboarding/compare/5218a45...2b5b67b.

The main error PHPStan found was a group ID type mismatch during invitation acceptance: https://github.com/cuny-academic-commons/cac-onboarding/commit/c814bdc

In https://github.com/cuny-academic-commons/cac/commit/2700bc9e2f, I've addressed some PHPStan issues with bp-two-factor. Mostly PHPDoc fixes for the most part.


I'd like to add both cac-onboarding and bp-two-factor to our PHPStan matrix, but first, I want to ask Jeremy about whether setting up individual PHPStan jobs would be better or not. Right now, whenever a PHP file is changed, we run one PHPStan job that checks all our watched directories. What if we added individual PHPStan jobs for each of our watched directories? So if we made a change to /wp-content/mu-plugins/, that would only run the phpstan:mu-plugins script and none of the other PHPStan ones. Would there be a negative with doing this? If there is, then let's keep the same set up that we have right now and I'll add cac-onboarding and bp-two-factor to the existing matrix.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF